Response of growth regulating chemicals on branching and early canopy development in mango (Mangifera indica)

Growth Regulators and Mango Canopy Development

Authors

  • Kanchan Srivastava Principal Scientist, ICAR-CISH
  • A K Trivedi ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow 227 101, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shubham Pandey ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow 227 101, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Branching, Canopy development, Juvenility, Hormones, Pinching

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to enhance early canopy formation and precocity in mango (Mangifera indica L.), involving treating of grafted saplings with PBZ, TIBA, 6-BAP and tip pinching for hastening bearing and induction of early branching for quick canopy formation. The results showed that plant height, stem girth, number leaves and primary laterals were found non-significant in mango Dashehari, however, maximum number of primary laterals (3.67) was noted in T8 (pinching 5 cm) and maximum chlorophyll ‘a’ (1.89 mg/100 g) and total chlorophyll content (2.26 mg/100 g) were recorded in T7 . Similarly in Amrapali, maximum number of leaves (61.00) and highest number of primary laterals/plant (5.00) were noticed under treatment T8 (pinching 5 cm removing shoot apex). In Chausa, highest number of leaves (56.68) and maximum number of primary laterals (5.00) were recorded in treatment T8 (pinching 5 cm) and minimum number of leaves/ plant (31.00) and number of primary laterals (2.00) was recorded in T2 (6-BAP 100 ppm) and T7 (PBZ1500 ppm) respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Helail BM and Eissa MA.1997. Effect of some cultural practices and growth regulator treatments on growth of mango seedlings. Annals of Agricultural Science, 35 (2): 883-894.

Helail BM and Eissa M A. 1997. Effect of some cultural practices and growth regulator treatments on growth of mango seedlings. Annals of Agricultural Science, 35 (2): 883-894.

Anonymous. 2020.Horticulture At A Glance (2018). National Horticulture Board, MOA&FW, GOI.

Islam M N, Rahim MA, Farooque AM and Hoque ATMR. 2006. Effect of pruning time and planting distavce on the scion production of mango (Mangifera indica) from clonal hedgerow. Journal of Science, Biological Sciences. 35 (2) : 163-169.

Jung HW, Lee JY. 2008. Physical treatments influencing lateral shoot development in one-year-old ‘Fuji’/M.9 nursery apple trees. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology, 49 (5), 265-270

Preston AP. 1968. Pruning and rootstock as factors in the production of primary branches on apple trees. Journal of Horticultural Science. 43(1): 17-22.

Van den Berg A. 2003. Certified Nursery Tree Production in Holland. The Compact fruit tree, 36(2), 43-45.

Volz RK, Gibbs HM, Popenoe J. 1994. Branch induction on apple nursery trees – effects of growth-regulators and defoliation. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 22, 277-283.

Wertheim SJ. 1978. Manual and chemical induction of side-shoot formation in apple-tree nursery. Scientia Horticulturae, 9 (4), 337-345.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Srivastava, K., Trivedi, A. K., & Pandey, S. (2026). Response of growth regulating chemicals on branching and early canopy development in mango (Mangifera indica) : Growth Regulators and Mango Canopy Development. Current Horticulture, 14(3). Retrieved from https://www.currenthorticulture.com/index.php/CURHOR/article/view/370